News

Argyle Director Resigns

|
Image for Argyle Director Resigns

Plymouth Argyle director Damon Lenszner has resigned, after two and a half years at Home Park.

The Argyle boardroom now has just four directors following Lenszner´s departure and Nic Warren leaving last season.

Lenszner has decided to concentrate on his employment agency business.

A club statement was issued earlier today: ‘Unfortunately, business and family pressures are such that I cannot serve the club.’ Lenszner said.

‘On the day I joined, all I wished for was that the day I left, the club would be in a better position than the day I joined. I believe this is the case.

‘I genuinely believe that we are on course to reach the Premiership in the not-too-distant future.’

Last December the Argyle board turned down a bid from a consortium of wealthy Argyle fans who wanted to invest an initial five million pounds into the club.

Following Lenszner´s resignation and the club now having just four directors, the consortium would be wise to come up with a second offer and provide much-needed funds for the Pilgrims.

Will the consortium try again and will Argyle chairman Paul Stapleton accept their latest offer?

Share this article

4 comments

  • green giant 12 says:

    thanks for all ure work, all the best for the future. now stapleton get sum1 in with some money!

  • miked_joker says:

    I wonder what the real reason for his resignatin

  • WDGreen says:

    Thanx Mr Lenszner for your energy and commitment to the Argyle in getting us this far; also, I admire your integrity and courage to stand down at this particular time. This now raises the question of a replacement[s]; to you Mr Stapleton, choose wisely and not just on the flash of a pound note. We have faith, trust and respect in you, so don’t jeopardise these and stick to your principles. Good luck; now come on you GREENS and get ready to march, raise the battle standards and we’ll take no prisoners starting at Hull.

  • Snafubar says:

    I think Paul Stapleton might be more willing to enter dialogue should the consortium approach with another offer of investment. Now that there will be no casualties on the current board, the offer of an investment – even with the condition of two of the consortium getting on the board – will be seen as attractive.

Comments are closed.